The content bellow is available only in French.

publié dans Revue Grain de sel le 27 novembre 2007

Editorial: EPA: Beyond Trade

Freddy Destrait

Accords de Partenariats Economiques (APE)

Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) are shortly to be signed between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACP) and should become effective in January 2008. These agreements will establish free-trade areas between the EU and each one of the six ACP regions. The EU’s main argument in support of establishing the EPAs is that the current EU-ACP trade cooperation rules do not comply with WTO rules.
The EPA concept was formed in the mid-90s, when the world still believed in the virtues of free trade. Ten years later, this belief has somewhat evaporated! But in the absence of a clear-cut alternative – the Doha round is at a standstill – things are being allowed to continue on the initial course. Admittedly, the mobilisation of civil society stakeholders and certain ACP countries will help protect the major products that are sensitive to trade-opening measures. But this will only limit the damage for EPA opponents, and reduce the benefits of reform for its supporters.
Never do you see trade serving the cause of human development. Neither do you see the goals of fair trade (respect of land, resources and people) being integrated as official trade objectives.
Once again, an international agreement is providing answers to yesterday’s problems, but refrains from addressing tomorrow’s challenges. The big reform that would see the ACP-EU partnership establish itself as a new laboratory of equitable North-South and South-South international relations is yet to be devised. Many stakeholders have invited themselves to the EPA debate, both in ACP countries as well as in Europe. If we were all prepared to shake up the comfortable status quo and relinquish our entrenched positions, then we could really hope to devise and implement such a reform! The ACP-EU relations system is based on three main dimensions, policy, trade and development. ACP-EU trade cooperation must be built as one of the elements of an overall development strategy and not as an end in itself. In that vein, trade development requires rules that, while being effective, must also be equitable. The WTO is a policy forum within which the ACP-EU duo could jointly exert pressure to defend other approaches, other more balanced and human development-friendly rules. The EU and the ACP countries wield significant political impact: 105 countries grouping slightly over one billion inhabitants and, within the WTO, 83 members out of 150.
Could the ACP-EU zone become a real platform for policy dialogue and negotiation of rules that are not subjected to market laws alone? This is a matter of political will. But does the EU have this political will, when it constitutes the major donor of the ACP countries and one of the largest centres for global trade?

Restez informé⸱e !

Abonnez-vous à nos publications et bulletins pour les recevoir directement dans votre boîte mail.

Autres articles qui pourraient vous intéresser

Vous lisez un article de la publication "39 : Economic Partnership Agreements: Presentation, analyses, viewpoints (en)".

Grain de sel n°39 : Economic Partnership Agreements: Presentation, analyses, viewpoints
Inter-réseaux

Special issue on EPA’s This issue of Grain de Sel (GDS) is indeed special on several counts … First of all, there are a total of 40 pages dedicated to a single subject. Secondly, it includes an eight-page supplement jointly published with the Network of farmers’ and agricultural producers’ organisations of West Africa (ROPPA), presenting the position of farmers’ organisations from five ACP regions. The whole issue is published in French and English and will be widely circulated….

Lire PDF
Networks of farmer organisations speak about the EPAs
Inter-réseaux

West African farmers are saying stop to the EPAs Saliou Sarr Food sovereignty and regional integration are the main expectations of the Network of Farmers’ and Agricultural Producers’ Organisations of West Africa (ROPPA) with regard to the EPAs. At the same time, these agreements in their current form only portend, for them, poverty and threats to the survival of the region’s farmers. PROPAC wonders how family farming can benefit from the EPAs Alexandre Manga Ndzana Alexandre Manga Ndzana…

Lire PDF
Negociation Process and Alternatives
Inter-réseaux

Are non-governmental stakeholders really participating in the negotiations? Davina Makhan There is a strong call for non-governmental stakeholder participation in the trade negotiations and this is specifically included in the Cotonou Agreement. With a few monthsto go before the cut-off date of 31 December 2007, have civil society stakeholders, professional bodies and parliamentarians really been involved in the negotiations? Trade agreements for development? Anna Lipchitz While everyone agrees that the EPAs must contribute to the development of ACP…

Lire PDF
Impacts and Implications
Inter-réseaux

Will agricultural producers be able to increase their exports to Europe? Claudius Preville Given their heavy dependence on exports, African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries hope that the EPAs will help them to maintain, or even improve, their access to the European market for all goods, and for agricultural commodities in particular. But there is a wide gap between theory and practice. Will the agrifood chain be able to face the European competition? Cecilia Bellora Trade of the…

Lire PDF
The Cotonou Agreement: across-the-board reform of ACP-EU cooperation
Quentin Stoeffler, Sanoussi Bilal

The Cotonou Agreement is a reform of the cooperation governed for 25 years by the Lomé Conventions. It constitutes a revival in cooperation between the European Union and ACP countries, and brings about a transition towards a new trading system, which should come into effect in 2008 with the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs). These will constitute the trading aspect of the Cotonou Agreement. The ACP-EU partnership remains based on three pillars: policy dialogue, special commercial relationships and development…

Lire PDF
Before EPAs, a system that was hardly conducive to agricultural development in ACP countries
Roger Blein, Vincent Ribier

Initially signed for 5 years in 1975, the Lomé Convention governed relations between the European Union (EU) and the ACP countries between 1975 and 2000. The Lomé Convention included two complementary elements, development assistance (with the European Development Fund, EDF) and a trade agreement characterised by non-reciprocal tariff preferences. This trading system is still in force today and will be removed only when the Economic Partnership Agreements (due to be signed in December 2007) are actually put in…

Lire
Editorial: EPA: Beyond Trade
Freddy Destrait

Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) are shortly to be signed between the European Union (EU) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACP) and should become effective in January 2008. These agreements will establish free-trade areas between the EU and each one of the six ACP regions. The EU’s main argument in support of establishing the EPAs is that the current EU-ACP trade cooperation rules do not comply with WTO rules. The EPA concept was formed in the mid-90s,…