Cet article est uniquement disponible en Anglais.

Ceci est un article de la publication "51: Special Issue: Nigeria", publiée le 1 février 2011.

Nigeria: From Customs exceptions to a Regional Trade Policy


Accords de Partenariats Economiques (APE)Politiques commercialesTECNigeria

Nigeria stands out in the sub-region for its traditionally protectionist trade policy. This tendency, which is partly in question today, has slowed down the process of West African regional integration.

Nigeria’s trade policy is above all a tool to foster growth, and is framed to be consistent with the country’s overall development objectives. This policy is formulated and implemented via legislation and regulation, as well as by directives issued by the federal Ministry of Finance.

Protectionism Is Losing Ground. Although Nigeria continues to use the same trade policy instruments, i.e. tariff and non-tariff barriers[[Tariff barriers are import and export taxes, tariff quotas, etc. Non-tariff barriers are quantitative restrictions on imports and exports such as quotas, licences, prohibited products, etc.]] , the combinations of the two have changed considerably over time. Export taxes in particular were progressively reduced starting in the 1970s and disappeared altogether in 1980.
Until the middle of the 1980s, Nigeria’s trade policy was highly protectionist. Agricultural products, in particular grains and oils, were subject to high customs duties, between 50% and 100%, from 1982 to 1985. Quantitative import restrictions were placed on some 200 agricultural products between 1982 and 1985, and exports of nearly all agricultural foodstuffs were banned.
In 1986, Nigeria was subject to a structural adjustment programme. This marked the beginning of a progressive liberalisation of the trade regime, including agricultural trade. The process started with the setting up of a transitional regime for customs duties, a reduction in the number of products subject to an import ban (from seventytwo to seventeen product categories), and the elimination of import and export licence regimes. A new tariff schedule was then put into place for the period 1988-1994, followed by another schedule for 1995-2001. The latter schedule was finally extended to 2004.
During this period, customs duties on agricultural products also dropped, from an average rate of 37% in 1988 to 33% in 2000. The number of products subject to duty of less than 50% rose between 1988 and 2000, while the number of products subject to duty over 50% fell from 13% in 1988 to 7% in 2000. The agricultural products and foodstuffs subject to the highest tariffs are beverages and spirits (76.4%), tobacco (61.2%), grains (54.2%) and horticultural products (52.5%).
In addition, Nigeria has applied VAT at 5% (the lowest rate in the region) to domestic and imported products since 1993, and excise duty of between 20% and 40% on certain imports.

An Unpredictable and Opaque Trade Policy. Nigeria’s trade policy is characterised by unpredictability, lack of transparency and the confusion created by many special regimes. Tariff schedules and lists of banned imports are revised frequently. The Nigerian customs authorities systematically assert the right to modify custom duties or to implement other ad hoc trade measures. Many special-interest groups obtain amendments from the authorities, adding to the perpetual modification of the trade regime.
This situation is likely to come to an end, however. First, because the present trade policy seeks to achieve more systematic application of the official tariffs, and second, because it is likely to be more difficult to avoid procedures that are harmonised at the regional level.

Restrictions that Fuel Informal Trade. As a member of ECOWAS, Nigeria is supposed to apply the trade liberalisation measures that took effect in 2004. Trade in products between countries in the region should therefore be entirely liberalised. This is not the case, and Nigeria’s protectionist stance fosters widespread informal trade on the sub-regional scale, particularly in agricultural products.
An analysis of trade data for Benin reveals gaping discrepancies between official statistics and “mirror” statistics[[Mirror statistics are obtained by comparing the official figures of one country with those of its trade partners to verify their reliability and eventually fill in missing data.]]. These discrepancies are greatest for products that are subject to import bans or high customs tariffs in Nigeria. It has also been shown that consumption of products subject to bans and/or high import tariffs in Nigeria is much higher in Benin than in Nigeria. On the face of it, per capita rice consumption in Benin appears to be very high, so high that Benin, a country with a population of fewer than 10 million people, imported as much rice as a country with a population of 130 million! Rice imports doubled in Benin between 2004 and 2005. These products subjected to restrictive measures in Nigeria only pass through Benin on the way to their final destination, Nigeria. In the case of rice, subject to a 50% customs duty in Nigeria and 8.75% in Benin, the share of Benin’s import of rice classified as “in transit” increased from 79.9% to nearly 100% of total rice imports between 2004 and 2006.
The intense trade between Niger and Nigeria is based primarily on the competitive advantages of the two countries: a very large proportion of livestock raised in Niger is exported to Nigeria, and this country in turn exports grains to Niger. These flows build better food security in both countries, and particularly in Niger.

Nigeria’s Discordant Policy Is Progressively Aligned with ECOWAS Policy. Today’s move to regional integration in West Africa is gradually modifying Nigeria’s trade policy regarding agricultural products. Specific measures in the process are the institution of a Common External Tariff (CET), the ECOWAS Agricultural Policy (ECOWAP), and the ongoing negotiations of an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between West Africa and the European Union (EU).
In 2005, Nigeria adopted an interim tariff schedule in order to align Nigeria’s tariffs with the ECOWAS CET [[A single tariff schedule for all the member countries of ECOWAS.]]. This was a difficult task for Nigeria, in that the maximum tariff allowed by the ECOWAS CET was 20%, whereas Nigerian customs duties reached 50% for some products. Nigeria pushed hard for a fifth tariff band at 50% under the ECOWAS CET. While Nigeria did not win out in on the issue of the tariff rate, a fifth band was accepted in principle [[The heads of state of the ECOWAS countries formally adopted the principle of a fifth tariff band at 35% in June 2009.]]. The designation of products to be classed in this fifthh band and the alignment of the new CET structure with the EPA process have not yet been finalised. The current tariff structure is in effect for the period 2008-2012, and comprises five tariff bands: 0% for essential goods; 5% for most raw materials; 10% for intermediate products; 20% for finished products that do not require protection; 30% for finished products that are processed locally. The latter are of strategic importance, notably in terms of customs revenue, and protection is necessary in the interest of local processors.
The results observed to date are mixed: although import tariffs in Nigeria are to a certain degree in line with the ECOWAS CET, in addition to tariffs Abuja regularly announces lists of imports that are banned to reinforce protection of the country’s agriculture and industry. The return of these practices is a sign of discordant trade policy in the region, in particular between Nigeria and its neighbours. Nigeria advances several types of arguments to back its import bans: protection of domestic industry, rejection of dumping practices (especially poor-quality merchandise), security issues, sanitary and consumer health concerns, tax revenue, etc. The federal Ministry of Finance’s list of banned imports, including from ECOWAS countries, currently contains twenty-seven categories of products: pork, beef, cassava and its by-products, fruit juices, water, cement, a set of seventeen pharmaceutical products, pharmaceutical waste, tyres, used car engines over ten years old, and textiles. A 2004 directive also included fresh fruit and vegetable oils among the banned products.

Towards a Regional Trade Policy. Even though it is an intra-regional process, establishing a Common External Tariff in West Africa is a prerequisite to the signature of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the EU and ECOWAS. The Nigerian position has had a strong impact on the implementation of the EPA. While neither Nigeria nor the thirteen least developed countries (LDCs) in ECOWAS had signed EPAs at the end of 2007, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire have concluded interim EPAs.
In fact, the EPA talks aimed at regional integration have led to the application of several different tariff regimes in the region. As of January 2008, there were three regimes for trade between the EU and ECOWAS countries:
– non-reciprocal market access applied to “everything but arms” (EBA) for the thirteen LDCs in West Africa;
– the interim EPA regime for two non- LDCs, Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana, that stipulates progressive implementation of a reciprocal free-trade agreement; and
– a generalised system of preferences (GSP) regime, much less advantageous, for Nigeria.
The discordant trade policies of Nigeria and its neighbours can be better understood by analysing the factors that are determinant for Nigeria. Nigeria’s need to protect its agriculture from competition with imported products goes beyond economic arguments, and touches upon food security and employment issues.
ECOWAS’ current attempts to form a customs union call for not only effective elimination of trade tariffs between member countries, but also for a Common External Tariff to be applied to trade with outside countries. These measures necessitate significant reform of Nigeria’s trade policy.

This article is adapted from an article by E. Olawale Ogunkola, available online at the Inter- Réseaux website.

E. Olawale Ogunkola is a professor of economics at Ibadan University and he directs the Trade Policy Research and Training Programme. Prof. Ogunkola has been a visiting scholar at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and a visiting lecturer at the National University of Lesotho. He has published widely on trade topics and regional integration in Africa

Stay informed⸱e!

Subscribe to our publications and newsletters to receive them directly in your mailbox.

  • This field is used for validation purposes only and should remain unchanged.

Other articles that might interest you

Grain de sel No. 51: Nigeria. A Look at the Agricultural Giant of West Africa

Contents A Grain de sel « Country Report » Editorial The Nigerian Giant, an Imposing Neighbour Jean François Sempéré Benchmarks Benchmark – Nigeria Inter-réseaux Forum Nigeria: Called to Hegemony Daniel C. Bach With its privileged position in the sub-region, Nigeria is poised to play a pivotal role in ECOWAS. But Nigeria’s elites and its public policies must show that they are up to this challenge. On the way to a single currency for ECOWAS Countries ? Gilles Dufrénot The ECOWAS…

Lire PDF
A Grain de sel « Country Report »

Breaking with its custom, Grain de sel is devoting this issue exclusively to one country, Nigeria. Why this country? Nigeria alone represents half of the population of West Africa and half of its economy. Despite its size and influence on all surrounding countries, most rural and agricultural development actors in French-speaking countries (and sometimes in English-speaking countries as well) both in the North and within Africa know little about Nigeria. This special issue contains reports on initiatives, analytical…

Lire PDF
The Nigerian Giant, an Imposing Neighbour
Jean François Sempéré

By its size and population Nigeria is almost a subcontinent in and of itself. The country continues to have one of the most dynamic economies in Africa, with GDP growth of around 6% in 2009. The effects of the international crisis have been felt, however, with a significant drop in oil prices, scarcer credit and a financial sector made fragile by toxic assets. These factors threaten the precarious macroeconomic equilibrium that had been attained between 2003 and 2007,…

Benchmark – Nigeria

Facts on Nigeria Agricultural Activity in Nigeria A Large and Divided Population. With a population of over 150 million people, Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa. It is home to one-sixth of the continent’s population, and to half of the people in ECOWAS. It is also one of the most urbanised countries in Africa, with at least twenty-four cities of over 100,000 residents. Nigeria is highly diverse, with a large number of ethnic, cultural, linguistic and…

Lire PDF
Nigeria: Called to Hegemony
Daniel Bach

With its privileged position in the sub-region, Nigeria is poised to play a pivotal role in ECOWAS. But Nigeria’s elites and its public policies must show that they are up to this challenge. A Decisive Economic Influence in the Sub-Region. Both within and outside of the country, Nigeria’s vocation to dominate and structure the sub-regional environment is no longer contested, and Nigeria is expected to play a key role in African and international organizations. The time is long…

Lire PDF
On the way to a single currency for ECOWAS Countries ?
Gilles Dufrénot

The ECOWAS countries are on the way to establishing a single currency by 2020. Nigeria is poised to play a major role in this process. While the plan apparently has unanimous support, “the devil is in the details.” Grain de sel: What is your analysis of the currencies now in use in West Africa? Gilles Dufrénot: The “currency map” of West Africa comprises several different exchange regimes. There is a monetary union, made up of the eight countries…

Lire PDF
Staple crop production and consumption: Nigeria on the way to food self-sufficiency

Nigeria is endowed with abundant natural resources and has substantial agricultural potential. While it ranks first among the leading agricultural producers in the region, it is also the largest importer of staple products in West Africa. Despite the preponderance of hydrocarbons, the agricultural sector continues to play a decisive role in Nigeria’s economic development. Agriculture accounts for about 36,5% of the creation of gross domestic product in the country and employs nearly 45% of the country’s workforce. With…

Lire PDF
Demand for farm animal products in Nigeria: An opportunity for Sahel Countries?
Bernard Bonnet, Bertrand Guibert, Christophe Bénard

Nigeria is a major hub of animal product consumption in West Africa. It is also one of the largest livestock-raising countries in the region. Meeting the ever-increasing domestic demand and access to these flourishing markets are major economic stakes for Nigeria and for the neighbouring Sahel countries that raise livestock. By its population and capacity for animal production, with 25% of livestock herds in the sub-region, Nigeria is by far the leading livestock producer in Central and West…

Lire PDF
Nigeria’s Agricultural Policy: Seeking Coherence Within strategic Frameworks
Fanny Grandval, Mathilde Douillet

While Nigeria has many singular features, the country is no exception when it comes to agricultural policy in the region, caught between enormous potential, immense ambitions, and still-insufficient concrete results. Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, with an urban population growing at an exponential rate. The government’s objective of achieving food self-sufficiency is a major challenge. In this country that is experiencing relatively rapid economic growth, this goal is not unrealistic but will require a great…

Lire PDF
Historic Oppotunities for Rice Growers in Nigeria
J. Manful, adiagne, ibamba, ojajayi-ng

The rice value chain in Nigeria is in a period of growth, thanks in particular to strong support policies. Work remains to be done, however, to give growers access to improved seeds and improve quality, so that locally grown rice can fully meet the needs of urban consumers. Local rice cultivation provides livelihoods for many producers, processors and vendors in Nigeria. However, it does not satisfy the totality of consumer demand in the country. Nigeria imports on average…

Lire PDF
Nigeria: From Customs exceptions to a Regional Trade Policy

Nigeria stands out in the sub-region for its traditionally protectionist trade policy. This tendency, which is partly in question today, has slowed down the process of West African regional integration. Nigeria’s trade policy is above all a tool to foster growth, and is framed to be consistent with the country’s overall development objectives. This policy is formulated and implemented via legislation and regulation, as well as by directives issued by the federal Ministry of Finance. Protectionism Is Losing…

The Agro-Pastoral Product With Neighbouring Coutries: What’s at stake?
Bio Goura Soulé

Nigeria is a central actor in the trade of farm and livestock products between countries in the sub-region. This article presents and analyses intra-regional trade in West Africa. Trade between Nigeria and its neighbours in West Africa (Niger and Benin) and in Central Africa (Cameroon, Chad, Equatorial Guinea) is intense and long-standing. As a consequence of its economic importance (over 50% of GDP in ECOWAS), population (one out of every two West Africans is Nigerian), and contrasting levels…

Lire PDF
Nigeria’s role in Niger’s Food Security

Some land-locked Sahel countries in Africa are dependent on cross-border trade for their food security. What is the situation in Niger today? How do the cross-border flows of staple foodstuffs from Nigeria allow Niger to ensure its food security? This article describes the trade between these two countries. Without the farm and animal products that arrive from Nigeria, it is hard to imagine how food security could be assured for the people of Niger. Given that the country…

Lire PDF
A look at agriculture and agribusiness in Nigeria
Inter-réseaux, Ndidi Okonkwo Nwuneli

Agriculture in Nigeria as seen by a Nigerian specialist. In some respects, the circumstances in Nigeria resemble those of neighbouring countries. In this analysis, the emphasis is on pragmatic approaches and the spirit of enterprise, whether family-run businesses or larger-scale operations. Grain de Sel: What is your diagnosis of the agricultural sector in Nigeria? Ndidi Nwuneli: Agriculture is the most important sector in the Nigerian economy. It employs 60% of Nigerians, including many rural women, and contributes up…

Lire PDF
Farmers’ Organizations Not Yet Unified in Nigeria

There are a great many farmers’ organizations in Nigeria, but can we speak of a Nigerian “farmers’ movement”? Between the large umbrella organizations that are sometimes manipulated by the government authorities, and a multitude of local initiatives, Nigerian farmers are now beginning to look for a path to unity. Even if farmers’ organizations (FOs) in Nigeria are not yet well structured, several broad categories can be distinguished: FOs with a general scope and focus on advocacy; FOs set…

Lire PDF
The Nigerian Giant Hungers for its Neighbours’ Coconuts
Ambrose Kwaku, François Ruf, Jérémy Salinier, courbetp

Nigeria is generally seen as a regional giant capable of stimulating the agricultural economies of neighbouring countries. Without appropriate public policies, however, regional integration has its limits. Here, we illustrate this with a case study of a little-known activity, the coconut value chain in Ghana. At scientific meeting in 1990, a researcher displayed a map of agricultural production in West Africa with a large blank space for Nigeria, indicating the absence of reliable data on this regional giant….

Lire PDF
News from Inter-réseaux

Grain de sel The subjects of upcoming special reports to be published by Grain de sel (GDS) in 2011 have been selected by the Board of Directors according to the suggestions made by the editorial committee. The topics covered will be: – grains (June); – land tenure (September). Readers are encouraged to make their own suggestions and propose articles on these topics (see the back cover for details on submitting articles). The results of the survey of GDS…

Lire PDF
Getting Fertiliser into farmers' Hands
Ketline Adodo, bkiger

To facilitate access to subsidised fertiliser for smallholder farmers in Nigeria, IFDC developed a fertiliser voucher programme that relies on a public-private partnership. This initiative has met with resounding success, even if many limitations remain to be addressed. Haladu Afdu, chairman of the Jumar Kwari Kamfa Fadama Farmers Cooperative in Wudil (Kano state), has just paid for two 50-kg bags of subsidised mineral fertiliser upon presentation of a voucher coupon that was allotted to each member of his…

Lire PDF